Under "Local Control", the LCAP is the only tool that the State of California gives to the Public to ensure transparency in how a district sets it's educational priorities, and how district funds are spent to ensure those priorities are met. Unfortunately, this appears to be nothing more than a blank check for public employee unions, and leaves the public with no recourse if they happen to live in a District that does not "HEAR" the input of the Public. Why California's LCAP does not work. A case study: The Capistrano Unified School District in Orange County CaliforniaCUSD has insufficient funding to pay for district funded Art, Music or Science (core educational classes that are required by the state for any student to receive a “minimum” education). CUSD has facilities that have not been fixed or maintained for 15 years. CUSD students attend school in overcrowded classrooms with staff to student ratios that are not safe. CUSD has limited programing based on the Canadian model of education and the work of Michael Fullan. Michael Fullan’s work is based on the belief that Professional Development is the number one priority for an educational institution. Class size and differentiated learning do not matter. In alignment with these beliefs, CUSD Staff has eliminated funding for GATE, and other programming for high achieving students. CUSD is the only District in South Orange County that does not offer a Geometry Honors class. CUSD is the only district that requires CCP/Stand Alone Health as a graduation requirement. As a result of these “unique” curriculum choices, the academic performance of students across all demographics is in decline. Math scores are plummeting and A-G completion rates are poor compared to other districts in south orange county. CUSD is no longer “the highest achieving large school district in the State”. CUSD has shifted priorities away from what is in the educational interest of students, to what is in the financial interests of employees. This will be the 5th consecutive year of across the board compensation increases for employees totaling over $120 million dollars in a district that cannot afford to fund a minimum curriculum. |
June 7, 2017 Board of Trustees Meeting Agenda Item #1 PUBLIC HEARING 2017-18 Local Control Accountability Plan and June 7, 2017 Board of Trustees Meeting Agenda Item #26 2017-18 Local Control Accountability Plan Information/Discussion The 2016-17 LCAP will be voted on at the June 28, 2017 BOT Meeting. |
||
June 7, 2017 BOT Meeting Agenda page 1: PUBLIC HEARING LCAP Board Audio at 27 minutes 40 Seconds:
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 8:01 AGENDA ITEM #26 is the same 2017-18 LCAP Plan Information & Discussion June 7, 2017 BOT Meeting Agenda Item #26 page 3872017-18 LCAP Plan Board Audio at 76 minutes 40 Seconds:Dr Susan Holiday Dr Susan Holiday presented this item and stated that the Board is required to approve this plan - a new rule that started this year. On May 24, 2017 CUSD presented a brief overview of the LCAP. CUSD had 18 stakeholder engagement sessions that took place with a wide variety of stakeholders. NEW! Districts must include their entire General Fund Budget in the plan for greater transparency. Many of the metrics are required. ie High School drop out data is required. CUSD received constructive feedback from the Public Hearing and would like to suggest replacing the following language regarding special education referrals: Staff is recommending that CUSD change this goal from "Decrease special education identification" to "Increase participation in pre-referral interventions prior to identifying students for special education programs". OCDE gives CUSD very high accolades on the District's LCAP. The LCAP must be approved by June 30, 2017 Board Audio at 80 minutes 45 seconds
Trustee Comments: Board Audio at 83 minutes 40 Seconds: Trustee Jones Trustee Jones asked staff about the lower graduation rates and was told that the lower rates were in ELL, Students with Disabilities, and African Americans. She asked staff to list those groups specifically in the LCAP rather than just the total number to make CUSD look better by explaining the decrease. Here is the Data Trustee Jones was asking for clarification on: ELL: ELL Actually increased - Staff? 2014-15: 89% 2015-16 91.7% Increase 2.7% Students with Disabilities: Actually increased - Staff? 2014-15: 79.8% 2015-16 80.6% Increase .08% The big decline was Foster Youth. Staff did not mention this group. And it should be noted that staff cut their Foster Youth budget in half. Foster Youth 2014-15: 84.6% 2015-16 71.4% Decrease 13.2% Source: Data Quest 2014-15 Outcome by Program Source: Data Quest 2015-16 Outcome by Program
Graduation Rates by Race: Source: Data Quest2014-15 District Enrollment by Ethnicity & Grade Source: Data Quest 2015-16 District Enrollment by Ethnicity & Grade Source: Data Quest 2016-17 District Enrollment by Ethnicity & Grade Source: Data Quest 2014-15 Graduates by Ethnicity Source: Data Quest 2015-16 Graduates by Ethnicity Source: Data Quest 2016-17 Graduates by Ethnicity - Data not available Yet Pacific Islander 2014-15 88.9% (Enrolled 9 students - 8 graduated) 2015-16 100% (Enrolled 6 students - 6 graduated) Increase 11.1% American Indian or Alaskan Native 2014-15 94.4% (Enrolled 18 students - 17 graduated) 2015-16 100% (Enrolled 20 students - 20 graduated) Increase 5.6% Filipino 2014-15 96.8% (Enrolled 93 students - 90 graduated) 2015-16 100% (Enrolled 74 students - 74 graduated) Increase 3.2% Asian 2014-15 100% (Enrolled 228 students - 228 graduated) 2015-16 97.6% (Enrolled Enrolled 249 students - 243 graduated) Increase 2.4% The Decrease by ethnicity was in your largest enrollment groups Whites and Hispanic/Latino. The largest percentage decline was in Not Reported 6.83% White 2014-15 97.6% (Enrolled 2,753 students - 2,687 graduated) 2015-16 96.5% (Enrolled 2,625 students - 2,533 graduated) Decrease 1.1% Two or More Races 2014-15 95.13% (Enrolled 226 students - 215 graduated) 2015-16 94.1% (Enrolled 267 students - 251 graduated) Decrease 1.03% Hispanic Latino 2014-15 94.9% (Enrolled 978 students - 928 graduated) 2015-16 92.9% (Enrolled 1094 students - 1016 graduated) Decrease 2% African American 2014-15 86.44% (Enrolled 59 students - 51 graduated) 2015-16 80% (Enrolled 65 students - 52) Decrease 6.44% Not Reported 2014-15 83.33% (Enrolled 6 students - 5 graduated) 2015-16 76.5% (Enrolled 17 students - 13 graduated) Decrease 6.83%
Board Audio at 84 minutes 40 Seconds: Trustee Jones Is CUSD required to give percentages for increase and decrease. Should CUSD change the LCAP Goals from "increase by 3%" to just "increase". If CUSD's goals just say increase or decrease CUSD will appear to meet more of their goals. Board Audio at 85 minutes 12 seconds: Trustee Jones The only Williams Act Schools we have are Kinoshita and Viejo correct? Staff verified that statement and said no other schools are covered by Williams Act. Note: This comment was very misleading- Uniform complaints under the Williams Settlement agreement can be filed at anytime on behalf of any school. Source: http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/cp/uc/ Williams ComplaintsA Williams Complaint, another type of UCP complaint, regards instructional materials, emergency or urgent facilities conditions that pose a threat to the health and safety of pupils, and teacher vacancy or mis-assignment and may be filed anonymously. Williams Complaints are filed with the principal, or their designee, of the school in which the complaint arises. Schools have complaint forms available for these types of complaints, but will not reject a complaint if the form is not used as long as the complaint is submitted in writing. A complaint should be filed on behalf of Ambuhel given the report findings by Kitchell. General Buildings: Life safety, ADA, inadequate restroom quantity Mechanical Systems: Poor condition, end of useful life, rust, corrosion. Two units inoperable Plumbing Systems: Inoperable water heater, water fountains, calcium build up Electrical Systems: Switchgear & panels past useful life, lamp replacement difficult, added receptacles required Fire Alarm Systems: Panel in poor condition Fire Sprinkler Systems: No fire sprinkler in main building THESE ARE VIOLATIONS OF THE WILLIAMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Estimated Repair Costs: $8,432,518 Immediate $990,954 Critical $2,822,094 Impending $1,081,514 Necessary $227,877 Discretionary $4,859,235 * Also Note that the SARC states that Ambuehl Facilities have a "Good" rating. *Also Note that CUSD inflated its Measure M Bond needs. In those documents CUSD said Ambuehl needed $14 million in repairs. There was no further discussion of the LCAP. Staff did not go through any of the data reports or individual test scores. |
2016-17 LCAP ANNUAL REVIEWMaterial Errors Should Be Corrected Prior To Board Approval. |
GOAL 1Engage students in meaningful, challenging, and innovative educational experiences to increase post-secondary options for all students. 25 Measurable Outcomes 19 Actions
|
Measurable Outcome 1 - OUTCOME NOT METIncreased student proficiency in academic achievement measures (including SBA) by State growth targets or by 3% in all grade bands and subgroups. Source: http://caaspp.cde.ca.gov/
|
Measurable Outcome 2 - OUTCOME NOT METClassroom instruction will reflect grade level standards, including integrated digital literacy skills as measured by Bright Bytes.
|
Measurable Outcome 3 - OUTCOME NOT METIncreased reclassification rate by 3% over previous year.
|
Measurable Outcome 4 - OUTCOME NOT METNumber of LTEL students will decrease by 2% over previous year in Grades 5-12
|
Measurable Outcome 5 - OUTCOME NOT METAMAO 1: Meet target AMAO 2: Meet target and increase by 3%
|
Measurable Outcome 6 - OUTCOME NOT METIncrease teachers appropriately credentialed and assigned by 1%
|
Measurable Outcome 7 - OUTCOME NOT METMaintain 100% student access to standards-aligned instructional materials
|
Measurable Outcome 8Systematic approach for identifying at-risk students
|
Measurable Outcome 9Appropriate interventions to meet the needs of at-risk students
|
Measurable Outcome 10Universal screening data will be gathered on an ongoing basis at all sites
PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST IS NEEDED: How many of these research applications have been approved and how much has CUSD been paid for this research?
As a result of this loophole- CUSD has found opportunities to profit from student data mining. The following are two examples:
Federal Money under the Obama AdministrationStimulus Money was used to conduct educational research studies - $4.8 billion -
CUSD received $22.4 million. InnovateEd; Trustee Hatton-Hodson's company, benefited from the collection of the data as a "sub-vendor". ![]() ![]() If you look at the list of vendors - CUSD has paid relationships with most. The Vendors are listed after the recipients so scroll down.
Hobsons California Readiness Block GrantsBIG RED FLAGCapistrano Unified and Capistrano Connections Academy are on the list of recipients of this grant money. How did CUSD get this grant? To qualify a high school has to have 75% of students who are Low Income or ELL.
9.5% of CUSD students are ELL. Source: DataQuest
22.31% (11,962 Socio-economically disadvantaged students out of total enrollment 53,613) DataQuest
The criteria is:
"High schools are eligible for this grant if they have at least 75 percent of students who are low-income or learning English as a second language. In our one-hour webinar on September 20, a panel of experts and educators will discuss grant details including:
• College readiness indicators and how they will be measured • The formula for determining grant recipients • How the grants will dovetail with current accountability plans • Ways schools and school districts can prepare for the grant application process • How college readiness fits into the current K-12 framework • Possible college readiness implications at the national level" ![]() Retired Trustee Hatton-Hodson left the Board early to move to Northern California where her company InnovateEd will now be providing workshops to teach Districts how to use their LCAP’s to enhance student learning, provide greater parent and community engagement and transparency. InnovateEd will profit greatly from the data they collected on CUSD students and their families.
CUSD will begin a new phase of the study by adding a new “Local" Dashboard which will begin social and emotional testing of CUSD students. The data collected under this study will begin in kindergarten with the Kindergarten Readiness Surveys and through personality testing through Naviance Family at different grade levels. The collection of personally identifiable social and emotional data begins to be within the medical area (HIPPA), and the collection and sale of such data is a violation of the privacy rights of every CUSD student and their families.
CUSD is forcing students to participate by embedding Naviance Family into classes that are required for graduation which effectively means Parents who are concerned about their family privacy have NO ABILITY TO OPT OUT of data collection.
Trustee Hatton-Hodson greatly influenced curriculum choices at CUSD, and has put the interest of her company and it's partners (LCAPca and Systems Leadership Collaborative and their research above the academic interest of students).
CUSD’s $10,000 payment to ACSA Education Foundation for CUSD's participation in Systems Leadership Collaborative last August is the basis for the on-going Conflict of Interest case against Trustee Hatton-Hodson.
It is CUSD's contracts for data-mining that is the real reason CUSD Trustees have voted to continue CCP/Health as a graduation requirement for one more year stating that even if they wanted to eliminate CCP/Health as a graduation requirement for 2017-18 they could not.
I placed the elimination of CCP/Stand Alone Health on the June 7, 2017 BOT meeting as a Citizen's Request. I did so specifically to have this discussion after Trustee Hatton-Hodson had left the Board. Staff granted my request and then immediately scheduled a vote to continue CCP/Health for an additional year essentially rendering my Citizens request meaningless.
The full Presentation can be viewed at: June 7, 2017 BOT meeting Agenda Item #23 page 324
Board Audio at 34:37
|
Measurable Outcome 11Counseling support will be available for sites
|
Measurable Outcome 12 - OUTCOME NOT METDecreased referrals for more restricted programs (aka special education)
|
Measurable Outcome 13 - DATA NOT RELEASED YET FOR 2016-17Decreased suspensions and expulsions
|
Measurable Outcome 14 - OUTCOME NOT METDecreased special education identification
|
Measurable Outcome 15 - OUTCOME METMaintain District attendance rate of 96% or higher
|
Measurable Outcome 16 - OUTCOME NOT METReduce chronic absenteeism rate by .4%
|
Measurable Outcome 17 - OUTCOME NOT METIncrease the number of students completing A-G by 3% from previous year
|
Measurable Outcome 18 - OUTCOME METIncrease HS graduation rate
|
Measurable Outcome 19 - OUTCOME NOT METDecrease MS and HS dropout rate
|
Measurable Outcome 20 - OUTCOME METContinued expansion of CTE pathways to reflect high wage/high demand industries/careers
|
Measurable Outcome 21 - OUTCOME NOT METEAP results will reflect a 3% increase or identified State target overthe prior year in students identified as "college ready"
|
Measurable Outcome 22 - OUTCOME NOT METIncrease Advanced Placement pass rate with 3 or higher by 3%
|
Measurable Outcome 23 - OUTCOME METIncrease number of Advanced Placement course test takers
|
Measurable Outcome 24 - OUTCOME NOT METAnnual Tech. Plan objectives will be met.
|
Measurable Outcome 25 - OUTCOME NOT METClassroom 1:1 device program will be expanded
|
Goal 1 Action 1: MIXED RESULTSEnsure effective learning conditions through highly qualified staff, reducing class size and providing adequate instructional days for students.
|
Goal 1 Action 2:
Provide professional development for teachers and classified instructional staff on state standards, effective instructional practices, assessment and data analysis
|
Goal 1 Action 3:
Ensure state standards-aligned curriculum and materials
|
Goal 1 Action 4:
Provide Professional Development, technical support, and progress analysis (aka Data Mining) in the area of digital literacy
|
Goal 1 Action 5:
Increase number of ELLs who reclassify as fully English proficient by 3%, and decrease the number of LTEL students by 2%.
|
Goal 1 Action 6:
Provide program guidance, professional development, materials and support for teachers and paraprofessionals serving English learners with a focus on ensuring access to state standards and ELD aligned instruction.
|
Goal 1 Action 7:
English learner program operations
|
Goal 1 Action 8:
Support data-driven decision making to increase student learning.
|
Goal 1 Action 9:
Provide professional development for special education teachers on curriculum and effective instructional practices.
|
Goal 1 Action 10:
Provide interventions for students at academic, social-emotional, and behavioral risk.
|
Goal 1 Action 11:
Enhance screening tools and other assessments to identify and monitor students requiring interventions.
|
Goal 1 Action 12: Provide management and oversight of districtwide interventions and site support.
|
Goal 1 Action 13: Provide interventions for foster students.
|
Goal 1 Action 14: Provide a program reflecting a broad course of study including STEM, CTE, VAPA, and electives.
|
Goal 1 Action 15: Provide college readiness and support program for potential first generation college attendees.
|
Goal 1 Action 16: Provide college readiness assessments and activities.
|
Goal 1 Action 17: Increase the number of students with disabilities succeeding in general education classes.
|
Goal 1 Action 18: Expand broad course of study through shifts from accelerated classes to honors classes with pacing guide development.
|
Goal 1 Action 19: Expand and enhance partnership with Saddleback College - expand college pathways with certificate track while in high school.
|
ANALYSIS: Describe the overall implementation of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal. Great First Instruction http://www.cucptsa.com/uploads//GFI_PAC_Nov14_2016.pdf Presentation by the PTA? Professional Learning Communities (PLC's) The idea of improving schools by developing professional learning communities. People use this term to describe every imaginable combination of individuals with an interest in education—a grade-level teaching team, a school committee, a high school department, an entire school district, a state department of education, a national professional organization, and so on. CUSD pulled so many teachers out of the classroom this year for meetings, trainings and Professional Development that CUSD teachers have a very high "Chronic Absentee" rate leaving students with subs on a pretty frequent basis. The cost per sub is $105 per day, while the teacher is also paid. This is in additional to the cost of the training. Did the lack of a consistent classroom teachers hurt student achievement more the the Professional Development helped? Multi-tierd System of Support http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/ri/mtsscomprti2.asp In California, MTSS is an integrated, comprehensive framework that focuses on CCSS, core instruction, differentiated learning, student-centered learning, individualized student needs, and the alignment of systems necessary for all students' academic, behavioral, and social success. Response to intervention, multitiered systems of supports, positive behavioral supports and interventions. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/12/14/what-are-multitiered-systems-of-supports.html Increase post-secondary options for all students. The increase in focus career and vocational training is great for those students that do not want to attend college after high school and would prefer to go straight into the work force. But there needs to be a balance so that those students who do plan to attend a 4- year college or university after high school, have the opportunity to do so. CUSD has made the decision to limit funding for accelerated programing for high achieving students. With unique curriculum choices like making CCP/Stand Alone Health a graduation requirement, every child who wants to complete A-G course requirements to get into 4-year college is instantly one year behind after their freshman year unless they take summer school, or zero period. CUSD lacks basic honors classes like Geometry Honors. The lack of accelerated programming makes it difficult for students to get needed bumps in GPA to compete with peers at other local schools, and across the world. When all is said and done- CUSD's curriculum, emphasis on Career and the lack of instruction in all core subjects that aligns with California Minimum State Content Standards and Curriculum Frameworks that is taught by a properly credentialed teacher, is the main reason that 75% of CUSD students have no option but Community College or a Career after High School. CUSD is preparing 3/4 of it's students for a job or Community College. Parents need to understand that so that those students who plan to use High School to get into a 4- year college are not prevented from doing so. Implemented Passport Intervention Curriculum Grades 1-5 Voyager Passport intervenes early to accelerate learning for students who need supplemental instruction to master priority reading skills and strategies. Source: http://www.voyagersopris.com/curriculum/subject/literacy/voyager-passport/overview Increase CTE Pathways Added Energy & Power, Food Science & Hospitality, Animal Science, Product Innovation & Design, Networking Furtureology Why is CUSD funding after-hour counselors at the Mission Viejo mall BEFORE it funds Core educational programs for all students. CUSD must include in it's budget Art, Music and Science instruction that aligns with minimum State Content Standards and Curriculum Frameworks that is taught by an appropriately credentialed teacher BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE. Relying on fundraising and donations creates wealth based inequities within the District that are illegal. Using one-time money for on-going core educational programs must end. |
ANALYSIS: Describe the overall effectiveness of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal as measured by the LEA. The Statement that ALL Student Groups met the Target of a 3% increase (from 56% to 59% met or exceeded the Standard is a FALSE STATEMENT. In ELA 69% - No change from 2015 to 2016. In Math 59% - 3% Increase from 56% to 59% Smarter Balanced Assessment English Language Arts All Students made no progress or declined in 2016 except for those students who exceeded the Standard. They increased their performance in ELA by 2%. Standard Exceeded: 2015 33% - 2016 35% - Increase 2% Standard Met: 2015 36% - 2016 34% - Decrease 2% Standard Nearly Met: 2015 18% - 2016 17% - Decrease 1% Standard Not Met: 2015 14% - 2016 14% - No Change 69% are meeting or exceeding standards - No Change from 2015 Source: CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment Math All Students made no progress or declined in 2016 except for those students who exceeded the Standard. They increased their performance in Math by 4%. Standard Exceeded: 2015 28% - 2016 32% - Increase 4% Standard Met: 2015 28% - 2016 27% - Decrease 1% Standard Nearly Met: 2015 25% - 2016 23% - Decrease 2% Standard Not Met: 2015 19% - 2016 18% - Decrease 1% 59% are meeting or exceeding standards- Increase 3% from 2015- 56% Source: CAASPP The English Learner Reclassification Rate Increased 1.6% The Goal was 3% so the stated goal was NOT MET. The High School Graduation Rate Increased .5% to 97.1% CUSD has the lowest possible graduation requirements - allowing students to pass with a "D". Most schools require a "C". |
ANALYSIS: Explain material differences between Budgeted Expenditures and Estimated Actual Expenditures. Was this $3,000 averted to cover Medi-Cal for Certificated Teachers?
|
ANALYSIS: Describe any changes made to this goal, expected outcomes, metrics, or actions and services to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and analysis of the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Identify where those changes can be found in the LCAP.
|
GOAL 2Communicate with, and engage students, parents, employees, and community members in Districtwide and community-specific
|
||
|
Measurable Outcome 2Increase participation by parents from underrepresented student groups in parent information and support activities
|
Action 1 - NEEDS TO BE CORRECTEDFacilitate effective communications with CUSD families and stakeholders
GATE: GATE was not a budgeted item. Board Agenda page 20 of 367 It was added after the 2016-17 LCAP had been approved. November 16, 2016 BOT Meeting Agenda Item #31 page 463 Board Audio at 169:13 (2 hours 49 minutes 13 seconds) Supporting Documentation: CUSDWatch Nov. 16th Meeting Agenda Item #12 Under Local Control each District decides how money will be spent. The State eliminated Categorical funding for GATE. CUSD Staff; without Board approval, made the unilateral decision to stop funding GATE and other programming for high achieving students. For example CUSD is the only school district in south Orange County that has no Geometry Honors Class. Without Board of Trustee approval District Staff has begun to eliminate funding for accelerated programing for high achieving students. CUSD's GATE program has effectively died. Concerned parents are now appealing to the Board to provide funding and special programming for CUSD's high achieving students. Statement on the record from Superintendent Kristen Vital regarding elimination of funding for GATE programming and other programming for high achieving students November 16, 2016 BOT Meeting Agenda Board Audio at 190.24 (3 hours 10 minutes and 24 seconds) Supporting Documentation: CUSDWatch Nov.16th Meeting Agenda Item #31 CUSD hired Hannover Partners to study data to determine if there is any real value to differentiated learning. This item contained a discussion of the value of class size, differentiated learning, and funding accelerated programing for high achieving students. January 25, 2017 BOT Meeting Item #20 page 530 Board Audio 75:50 (1 hour 15 minutes 50 seconds) Supporting Documentation: CUSDWatch Jan. 25th Meeting Agenda Item #20 The State of California adopted the Canadian Model of Education which believes that class size and differentiated learning have no bearing on academic achievement. Highly trained teachers and staff are the only thing that directly effects academic achievement. The Canadian model believes that Professional Development - staff collaboration and data driven education decisions will result in the greatest academic achievement for students. Staff - without Board Approval - has unilaterally eliminated programing for CUSD's high achieving students. The Hannover Research was conducted to prove this belief. The results of the study have never been shared with the Public to date. February 22, 2017 BOT Meeting Agenda Item #12 page 272 Board Audio: 65:30 (1 hour 5 minutes 30 seconds) Supporting Documentation: CUSDWatch Feb 22, 2017 Meeting Agenda Item #12 |
Action 2Facilitate effective communications with CUSD families and stakeholders
|
Action 3Facilitate communication, parent education, and engagement of parents of English learners
|
Action 4Provide Parent Support Network program to engage parents of students with special needs
|
ANALYSISDescribe the overall implementation of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal
LCAPca was actually designed through a Partnership between Trustee Hatton- Hodson's company InnovateEd + ACSA (Association of California School Administrators) + Progress Advisors. http://www.lcapca.com/expert-help.cfm The Goal of California's LCAP is to allow parents and community members to have greater input in the educational priorities of their local school district, and provide greater transparency on how district money is spent. Parents have continually expressed their desire to have lower class sizes and differentiated instruction. Parents have repeatedly expressed their desire see CUSD spend money to reduce class sizes. However, CUSD has used class size increases to balance their budget for the past 10 years. Parents have repeatedly expressed their desire see CUSD spend money to provide educational opportunities for the District's high achieving students by funding a real GATE program, and offering Honor's Classes (ie- Geometry Honors) that will allow students who want to attend a 4-year college to be able to compete with their peers in other Districts by having a competitive GPA. Parents have repeatedly expressed that CCP/Stand alone Health as a graduation requirement (a graduation requirement unique to CUSD) should be eliminated because it crowds out an entire block of coursework for all students that could be used to complete an A-G course. Students who want to attend a 4-year college after graduation are currently forced to take zero period or summer school for two years to complete their A-G required courses. The Public continues to express concern for the special needs students in the District who are being forced into mainstream classrooms without the programing and help they need to improve academically. Overcrowded classrooms without differentiated learning. "COMMUNICATION" by definition is a dialogue between two parties. The purpose of the LCAP is to encourage local school school districts to "LISTEN" to parents and the public when forming educational policy. CUSD does not hear...CUSD does not have a "Communication" plan. It has a marketing plan rooted in social media. Likes on Facebook- Increases in CapoTalk subscribers and daily tweets allow the District to send messages but nothing has been done to improve the communication from parents to CUSD. Staff has it's own agenda which follows the Canadian model of education which places as its number one priority Professional Development for educational leaders. Class size does not matter. Differentiated Instruction does not matter. The Public should understand that both Superintendent Vital and Trustee Hatton-Hodson are fully invested in this model and have pushed students into a curriculum and budget that has actually resulted in the decline in academic performance of students across all demographics as the data in Goal 1 clearly shows. http://innovateed.com/systems-leadership-collaborative/ Systems Leadership Collaborative Lead by ACSA, Michael Fullan, InnovateEd, The Flippin Group and Fagen, Friedman and Fulfrost was designed to help school districts successfully implement their LCAPs. Trustee Hatoon-Hodson resigned from her position as Trustee, and is now living in northern California on her 55 acre ranch in Grass Valley and her company will be profiting by teaching LCAP workshops. During her tenure as Trustee, her business has grown from less than one million in sales to over three million. https://www.acsa.org/Educational-Services/LCAP Superintendent Kristen Vital was Part of the Alliance for Excellent Education's advisory group in 2006. The Alliance for Excellent Education; in partnership with the US Department of Education, leads "Future Ready Schools". Future Ready Schools builds on the momentum of President Obama's Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the ConnectED Initiative. The goal is to foster and lead a culture of digital learning in their district, and to share what they have learned with other districts. To facilitate connectivity, the President formed the Office of Education Technology. "LOCAL CONTROL" - "COMMON CORE" - "COLLEGE AND CAREER READY" started at the Federal Level and is being implemented from the top down. Data is being collected on every student and will result in a dossier on every student from pre-school to adult. Such data collection is now including personality testing and metal health information which was once protected by HIPPA. |
ANALYSISDescribe the overall effectiveness of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal as measured by the LEA
|
ANALYSISExplain material differences between Budgeted Expenditures and Estimated Actual Expenditures
The following material differences have been identified and need to be explained BEFORE the 2016-17 LCAP Annual Review is approved by the Board on Wednesday June 28, 2017. |
GOAL 3Optimize facilities and learning environments for all students.4 Measurable Outcomes 2 Actions Measurable Outcome 1Standards for facility maintenance (good repair) will be met.
|
Measurable Outcome 2Williams Act facilities inspections will reflect compliance
|
Measurable Outcome 3Site discretionary supply accounts will return to baseline levels
|
Measurable Outcome 4Planning for implementation of anti-bullying/cyber-bullying curriculum.
|
Action 1Ensure that facilities are clean, safe, and functional
|
Action 2Enhance learning environment and effectively address bullying and/or cyber bullying
|
ANALYSISDescribe the overall implementation of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal
|
ANALYSISDescribe the overall effectiveness of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal as measured by the LEA.
|
ANALYSISExplain material differences between Budgeted Expenditures and Estimated Actual Expenditures.Campus Supervisor and Student Supervisor training 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Base was increased by $2,551 |
ANALYSISDescribe any changes made to this goal, expected outcomes, metrics, or actions and services to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and analysis of the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Identify where those changes can be found in the LCAP.SARC Reports need to be corrected to accurately reflect the condition of facilities. Uniform Complaints need to be filed on any school that has health and safety issues so that those can be fixed before a single penny is spent on Professional Development or increases to employee compensation. CUSD does not HEAR the public. There is no "Community Engagement" With the adoption of the 2017-18 Budget, CUSD will have given employees 5 straight years of across the Board compensation increases totaling over $150 million dollars. While students attend school with staff to student ratios that are not safe in facilities that have not been fixed or maintained for over 15 years. Core educational classes are paid for with one time fundraising and donations and are taught by parent volunteers creating wealth based inequities in the quality of education that all students receive in violation of state law. The California Healthy Kids Survey is another method of Data mining students. Source: CUSD Web Site The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) is a comprehensive youth health risk and resilience behavior data collection service available to all California districts, sponsored by the California Department of Education (CDE). It consists of a comprehensive survey instrument that assesses all major areas of health-related behavior, as well as a full-service survey support system to help districts collect and use CHKS data to improve prevention and health programs. At Capistrano Unified School District the survey is administered to 7, 9 and 11-grade students every other year in the Spring. The next time the survey will be administrated is in the Spring of the 2017-2018 school year. Full Documentation can be found at: CUSD is Selling Student Data an Open Letter to Elected Leaders |
There is no meaningful stakeholder engagement at CUSD unless you are an employee of the district.
I have personally done two separate Citizen Requests: January 27, 2016 BOT Meeting Agenda Item #5 page 7 of 535 "Fundraising for Core Educational Programs" CRICKETS- CUSD is still using Fundraising and Donations to pay for Core educational programs despite the fact that it creates wealth based inequities in the quality of education students receive within the District which is illegal. and June 7, 2017 BOT Meeting Agenda Item #23 page 344 "The Elimination of CCP/Stand Alone Health as a graduation requirement. CRICKETS - Because of a 5 year contract with Hobbsons Naviance to Data Mine CUSD students CUSD (after granting my Citizens Request- quickly held two meetings to vote to continue CCP/Health through January 2018 which rendered my request meaningless. There is no Taxpayer or PUBLIC engagement in CUSD. |
CLASS SIZES: Ryan Buris, Chief Communications Officer for CUSD released the following information regarding class sizes in CUSD: Based on the compiled data, the District is currently ranked 19th of 24 Orange County school districts in the average class size in kindergarten. Based on the compiled data, the District is currently tied and ranked 23rd of 24 Orange County school districts in the average class size in primary grades 1st - 3rd.
HUMMM? Should CUSD give employees their 5th consecutive across the board compensation increases or reduce class sizes to reasonable levels in Grades 1 -3?Mr Burris then stated: "Based on the compiled data, the District is currently tied and ranked 14th of 24 Orange County school districts in the average class size in upper grades 4th - 8th.
This data clearly shows that the District is tied for the highest average class size in grades 1 - 3 in Orange County. However, the data also clearly shows that the average class size is not an outlier based on all Orange County Districts. Additionally, the data shows that the District does not have the highest average class sizes in kindergarten or upper grades. Based on this analysis it is clear that District class sizes are not the highest in comparisons to other Orange County Districts, therefore the District also cannot have the highest class sizes in the nation.
We hope you find this infomration useful.
Thank you,
ryan
_________________________
Ryan Burris
Chief Communications Officer
Capistrano Unified School District
949-234-9427"
The only way to check the voracity of Mr. Burris's statement is to get a roster of every classroom and see how many students are in each class. Averages do not tell the truth for the following reasons:
Example 1:
Las Palmas Elementary School: Receives $250,000 donation from the Leonard Family Foundation every year to keep class sizes low. This is a 2-way language immersion program which would suffer substantial harm if class sizes (especially in lower grades) got to large since 1/2 the kids start the program not being fluent or literate in Spanish and 1/2 are not fluent or literate in Spanish.
![]() Kindergarten 25.6 to 1
![]() First Grade 25 to 1
![]() 2nd Grade 29.6 to 1
![]() 3rd Grade 27.8 to 1
![]() 4th Grade 25.8 to 1
![]() 5th Grade 25 to 1
![]() These lower class sizes pull the averages lower as a whole.
Example 2: Under enrolled schools (CUSD has 7) These are the Capo Forward Schools which CUSD spent a half million dollars to "re-brand".
RH Dana
![]() Del Obispo
![]() Hidden Hills
![]() Kinoshita
![]() Clarence Lobo
![]() Marblehead
![]() Wood Canyon
![]() |
CLASS SIZES: Ryan Buris, Chief Communications Officer for CUSD released the following information regarding class sizes in CUSD: Based on the compiled data, the District is currently ranked 19th of 24 Orange County school districts in the average class size in kindergarten. Based on the compiled data, the District is currently tied and ranked 23rd of 24 Orange County school districts in the average class size in primary grades 1st - 3rd.
HUMMM? Should CUSD give employees their 5th consecutive across the board compensation increases or reduce class sizes to reasonable levels in Grades 1 -3?Mr Burris then stated: "Based on the compiled data, the District is currently tied and ranked 14th of 24 Orange County school districts in the average class size in upper grades 4th - 8th.
This data clearly shows that the District is tied for the highest average class size in grades 1 - 3 in Orange County. However, the data also clearly shows that the average class size is not an outlier based on all Orange County Districts. Additionally, the data shows that the District does not have the highest average class sizes in kindergarten or upper grades. Based on this analysis it is clear that District class sizes are not the highest in comparisons to other Orange County Districts, therefore the District also cannot have the highest class sizes in the nation.
We hope you find this infomration useful.
Thank you,
ryan
_________________________
Ryan Burris
Chief Communications Officer
Capistrano Unified School District
949-234-9427"
The only way to check the voracity of Mr. Burris's statement is to get a roster of every classroom and see how many students are in each class. Averages do not tell the truth for the following reasons:
Example 1:
Las Palmas Elementary School: Receives $250,000 donation from the Leonard Family Foundation every year to keep class sizes low. This is a 2-way language immersion program which would suffer substantial harm if class sizes (especially in lower grades) got to large since 1/2 the kids start the program not being fluent or literate in Spanish and 1/2 are not fluent or literate in Spanish.
![]() Kindergarten 25.6 to 1
![]() First Grade 25 to 1
![]() 2nd Grade 29.6 to 1
![]() 3rd Grade 27.8 to 1
![]() 4th Grade 25.8 to 1
![]() 5th Grade 25 to 1
![]() These lower class sizes pull the averages lower as a whole.
Example 2: Under enrolled schools (CUSD has 7) These are the Capo Forward Schools which CUSD spent a half million dollars to "re-brand".
These schools will pull the averages for other schools down.
RH Dana
![]() Del Obispo
![]() Hidden Hills
![]() Kinoshita
![]() Clarence Lobo
![]() Marblehead
![]() Wood Canyon
![]() Compare that to Ladera Ranch Schools - The lack of equity is astounding- not legal and the use of "Average Class Sizes" covers up the truth.
![]() Example 3: Combo-Classes
Mixing grades because there is to many students for the number of teachers- for example A 3/4 Combo class will have 1/2 3rd graders and 1/2 4th graders.
If they have a Combo class of 30 kids total - 1/2 3rd Graders and 1/2 4th graders then on paper the will say there is a class of 15 3rd graders and a class of 15 4th graders which will also bring down the "average" for the District.
This covered the first 27 pages of the 87 page LCAP. This was the review of 2016-17 to see if CUSD met its goals. It did not. The remainder is projections for 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20.
|