CUSDWatch: This Agreement perpetrated a Fraud Upon Tax Payers and the San Diego Water Board | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The work is being done in pieces to avoid CEQA. The Right Of Way is flawed- it contains parcels that are owned by the Capistrano Unified School District in error. Capistrano Unified owns Parcels 59, 60, 69, 82 and maybe a part of Parcel 79. Capistrano Unified's ownership of Parcel 125-096-82 was just acknowledged by the Ranch and the District at the January 24, 2018 CUSD BOT Meeting. Unfortunately these four parcels are in the Right of Way and the water from the Right Of Way is all being drained onto Tesoro High Schools Property. The Water is Trespassing on school district land. The County has encumbered School District property. When you blow up the pictures on Google Maps- Zillow and Bing it is obvious that a lot of work has been done inside Tesoro High School Property boundaries.
If you zoom in close, you can see all the drainage culverts that have been created. The concrete culvert below was done by the Army Corp of Engineers- the rocks draining water from the graded area are new. So is the concrete culvert to the right that heads south. The water then runs underground Farther South along Tesoro Creek Road, two new culverts drain water from the Toll Road west to Tesoro The first one is below
The second one is below The culvert continues and actually passes under Tesoro Creek Road in two places. First one shown below Second one shown below And new gravel is draining water from Tesoro Creek Road West to the Tennis Courts There are four more culverts that run between the California Native Plant Garden and Tesoro High School Track - New Construction? And next to Tesoro High Schools Base Ball Diamond This grading and drainage work is being done inside Tesoro High School property boundaries on Parcels 60, 69 and 82 without the Capsitrano Unified School Districts knowledge or permission? How did this happen? The Right of Way is flawed. Caltrans/TCA/The County of Orange and the Ranch had no right to encumber the Capistrano Unified School Districts property. As a result of the work that has been done the end product is the Tesoro Extension of the 241 Toll Road built on District property without any protective barrier.
The California Regional Water Quality Control Board - San Diego Region 401 Water Quality Certification Number R9-2014-0144 "F" Street from "A" street to Oso Parkway Project specifically states at page 1 and 2 "The Applicant proposes to construct a new County of Orange arterial road called "F" Street that will extend approximately 5.5 miles from Cow Camp Road north to Oso Parkway, at the current terminus of State Route-241 (SR-241 ). In the future, "F" Street will be renamed to Los Patrones Parkway. "F" Street is not the Tesoro Extension of SR-241 that was denied waste discharge requirements by the San Diego Water Board in 2013 (in the proceedings on Tentative Order No. R9-2013-0007) or a facility related to the SR-241 and the Tesoro Extension is not covered by this Certification. "F" Street will be operated by the County of Orange as a free road."
It appears that on March 5, 2015, Robyn Uptegraff, Assistant Director of Orange County Public works filed a Notice of Determination indicating that the required analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") had been completed. The document filed with the San Diego Water Board to obtain a 401 Waste Water Discharge Permit contained material mis-statements of fact as high lighted below. Tesoro High School Facilities Report November 2017 Could the cracking be the result of the construction of the road so close to a school?
The noise studies that were done in the original EIR were done on a different alignment: The Tesoro Extension of the 241 Toll Road was a separate road much farther to the east of Tesoro High School. Los Patrones aka "F Street" was a separate road that was designed as a "Free Arterial Road". Because an arterial road is not as wide as a "Toll Road", Los Patrones aka F Street would have been at least 500 feet from Tesoro High School property line.
http://tca.civicclerk.com/Web/Player.aspx?id=118&key=-1&mod=-1&mk=-1&nov=0 Agenda Item #14 Oso Bridge Project Corporative Agreement The County admits this is a TCA Project
|
San Juan City Council Meeting February 6, 2018 - Land Sale Negotiations |
Are Developers Profiting Off of Bankrupt School Districts? Is the Toll Road Marching South of Ortega?CLOSED SESSION ITEMS - No Reportable Action
Law Suit: http://www.coastkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2017.06.02SanJuanComplaint_Exb_B_E.pdf Orange County Coast Keeper: https://www.coastkeeper.org/advocacy/octa-measure-m/ This group may be able to sue on behalf of Tesoro High School because the TCA- The County- CalTrans and The Ranch have graded drainage from the Oso Bridge Gap Closure Project/"F"Street onto Tesoro High School Property. The 401 Certification for Los Patrones aka "F" Street does not permit water to trespass onto Tesoro High School Property. List of People to contact re: 401 Certification Violations at Tesoro High School See: CUSDWatch: Members of the PUBLIC unite to file 4th Law Suit to Stop the Toll Road
F. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM 1. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (a) Consideration of Initiation of an Amendment to the Forster Canyon Planned Community Comprehensive Development Plan 81-01, Adding an Overlay of "SFR" (Single-Family Residential) to Allow a 7.29-Acre Potential School Site to be Developed with Up to 47 Single-Family Units (CA 17-008) (Applicant: Capistrano Unified School District. Property Owner: Pacific Point Development Partners, LLC) (420.40) Many Letters of Support for this zoning change came from parents who have children attending Palisades Elementary School - Palisades Elementary School needs $3.5 million in EMERGENCY REPAIRS- CUSD is stating that it needs to change the zoning on this property in order to pay for repairs and maintenance for Palisades. CUSD has given $150 million in 5 consecutive years of across the Board Compensation increases for employees (a choice NOT TO fix and maintain facilities- but to increases compensation instead). Note: CUSD spent $133,100 in Pacifica San Juan Mello Roos Fees attempting to change this zoning the first time See: CUSDWatch:Brown Act Violation Government Financial Strategies Asset Management Planning - Pacifica San Juan expenditures to Government Financial Strategies as of October 11, 2017 - This is a mis-use of Pacifica San Juan Mello Roos fees. $25,000 total, based on hourly rate, invoiced monthly. [Funding Source: Pacifica San Juan Mello Roos] CFO 98-1A bonds $54,050 for professional fees plus $1,000 for expenses, payable at completion [Funding Source Pacifica San Juan Mello Roos] CFO 98-1 B bonds $54,050 for professional fees plus $1,000 for expenses, payable at completion [Funding Source Pacifica San Juan Mello Roos]
CUSDWatch: January 18, 2016 Asset Management Plan Pacifica San Juan
|
CUSDWatch: San Diego Water Board Permit allowed the Ranch to grade and build drainage on CUSD property without notifying CUSD and the Public. All the water is being funneled onto Tesoro High School Property. |
When you blow up the pictures on Google Maps- Zillow and Bing it is obvious that a lot of work has been done inside Tesoro High School Property boundaries. If you zoom in close, you can see all the drainage culverts that have been created. The concrete culvert below was done by the Army Corp of Engineers- the rocks draining water from the graded area are new. So is the concrete culvert to the right that heads south. The water then runs underground Farther South along Tesoro Creek Road, two new culverts drain water from the Toll Road west to Tesoro The first one is below The second one is below
The culvert continues and actually passes under Tesoro Creek Road in two places. First one shown below
Second one shown below And new gravel is draining water from Tesoro Creek Road West to the Tennis Courts There are four more culverts that run between the California Native Plant Garden and Tesoro High School Track - New Construction? And next to Tesoro High Schools Base Ball Diamond This grading and drainage work is being done inside Tesoro High School property boundaries on Parcels 60, 69 and 82 without the Capsitrano Unified School Districts knowledge or permission? How did this happen? I think it is time for the Capistrano Unified School District to expand its law suit to include the Ranch and the San Diego Water Board. San Diego Water Board 401 Water Quality Certification |
Open Letter to CUSD Trustees re: Sex Education In Public School Date: Wednesday February 7, 2018 To: CUSD Board of Trustees Re: PUBLIC Concerns Over the New Sex Education Curriculum in Public Schools Dear Trustees: You were elected by the PEOPLE to represent the interest of Students and Taxpayers in all matters before the Board. At the next Board meeting you will be asked to approve a new health curriculum that is not age appropriate and contains content that can expose students to social, emotional and physical harm. Teen Talk assumes that all middle school students are sexually active. Teen Talk is seductive, not educational. Teen Talk is to graphic and not "age appropriate". Parents or guardians, should be notified when their student will receive controversial sexual health education at their school and be allowed to view the curriculum and other instructional materials prior to instruction. CUSD is making it impossible for working parents to view the curriculum by requiring that a parent come to the District office to view the curriculum. The curriculum should be made available on line for Public viewing. When the District makes Health a requirement to graduate and has Teen Talk as the required curriculum how can a student "OPT OUT" and still complete the Health requirement so that they are eligible to graduate? Documents released by Trustee Reardon show that it is Staff's recommendation that Health remain a required class for graduation and that this curriculum be taught in ALL GRADES not just 7th and 8th. I would urge Trustees to eliminate Health as a stand alone class required for graduation. Embed the minimum required Health curriculum in another class such as PE or Tutorial to avoid the more controversial aspects of Teen Talk upon which this curriculum is based. "Local Control" allows individual school districts to determine if Health should be a graduation requirement. The State of California does not make Health a graduation requirement. See: California Department of Education Minimum Course Requirements CUSD currently requires all students to take CCP and Health as stand alone class required for graduation. Together CCP/Health waste an entire block of study which places a substantial burden on CUSD's highest achieving students, by impacting their schedules with a meaningless year long class. This curriculum choice; which is unique to CUSD, has forced every student who plans to attend a 4-year college or University to take two years of summer school in order to complete their A-G course requirements. CUSDs A-G completion rates are substantially lower then they should be. Only 54.4% of students graduating from CUSD will have completed the courses they need to be accepted into a 4- year college or university. 45.6% of students graduating from CUSD will have no choice but to get a job or attend community college.
CUSD approved this Pilot Program December 6, 2017? Did Parents get proper notice that their child was being used to Pilot this program? Were Parents provided with an opportunity to OPT OUT of the Pilot?December 14, 2016 CUSD BOT Meeting Agenda Item #33 INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS RECOMMENDED FOR PILOT" SECONDARY SEXUAL AND HEALTH EDUCATION, GRADE 7-8 The Board Agenda is posted: http://capousd-ca.schoolloop.com/file/1218998819331/1455438848279/1373709562469729052.pdf no page listed - no supporting documentation The Board Meeting Audio is posted: http://cusd.capousd.org/cusdweb/audio2016-17/CUSDBoardMeeting.Dec.14.2016.mp3 at 148:21 TRUSTEE COMMENTS
at 1:53:00 Trustee Reardon: Has this material actually been reviewed by the IMRC Instructional Materials Review Committee?
at 153:09 Trustee McNicholas: I am on that Committee and I have not seen it.
at 1:53:14 Trustee Reardon: Was it presented to the Committee?
at at 1:53:16 Trustee McNicholas: I believe so, but I have been derelict in my duties.
* The Board Agenda states that it was submitted to the IMRC but Staff would not confirm that.
at 1:53:27 Trustee Reardon: There are two Board Delegates (Trustee Hatton-Hodson is absent)
at 153:27 Trustee Reardon- 2nd question. Can you provide clarification on the part of the act that requires parent notification and give us some assurance that Parents will have the option to Opt Out of the Pilot.
at 153:56 Dr Holiday assures Trustees that parents will be given notice and have the ability to Opt Out.
at 154:08 Trustee Hanacek: I hope parents don't Opt Out and allow their children to be informed and educated. We have bullying everyday.
at 154:53 Trustee Reardon: The Bargain that the Legislature struck to get these materials into the classroom was that parents would have the ability to Opt Out. We must honor that commitment to parents.
VOTE
at 155:16 Motion by Trustee Reardon to adopt the Pilot with assurances that Parents would be given notice and the ability to Opt Out. Second by Trustee Hanacek.
Motion Passed 6-0-1
Look at this timeline - why is CUSD implementing this curriculum before the First 60-day public review which is scheduled to be April - June 2018? 2019 Health Education Framework Revision TimelineSchedule of Significant Events for the 2019 Revision of the Health Education Framework for California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. Approved by the State Board of Education on September 9, 2016.
|
January 24, 2018 CUSD BOT Meeting Agenda Item #35 FIRST READING BOARD POLICY 6146.1 HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS- CA Healthy Youth Act |
Board Meeting Agenda at page 736 Board Audio at WARNING TO PARENTS:This Curriculum has content that is not age appropriate and may actually put students at risk socially, emotionally and physically. Parents should review the curriculum and decided where or not to opt your child out if the content is not appropriate for your child. I would urge Trustees to eliminate Health as a stand alone class that is required to graduate. Embed the minimum required Health curriculum in another class such as PE to avoid the more controversial aspects of Teen Talk upon which this curriculum is based. The elimination of Health together with the elimination of CCP, will enable students to have a full year of an additional block which would able more students to complete A-G course work and help improve college acceptances. Trustee Jim Reardon released his files on the proposed Health class which is provided below. Parents and Teachers across California are expressing concern over a controversial State Law: "The California Healthy Youth Act" a mandatory sex education curriculum that many feel is vulgar, and presents sexual content that is not age appropriate. Parents are not being given to the opportunity to review the curriculum. To review the curriculum a parent must drive to the District Office and make a request to view the content at the District Office. That is almost impossible working families. Under "Local Control” individual teachers control classroom instruction and curriculum content. As such, instruction can vary from class to class and instructor to instructor. CUSD presented this as a 7th and 8th grade Pilot however, materials released to the Public by Trustee Jim Reardon show an intent on CUSD's part to teach this curriculum in every grade. This curriculum is not age appropriate for every grade. Who determines what is "age appropriate"? An individual teacher- a paid consultant with a Political Agenda? Is this a sex education curriculum, or is it a curriculum that seeks to promote the political agenda PFLAG formerly known as Parents,, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays- a large United States Organization for parents, families, friends, and allies united with people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. Why are parents being forced to "OPT OUT" of this controversial curriculum? Usually Parents are asked to "OPT IN" when content may be controversial. This is a shift in State policy regarding parental notification and choice. Why is the State mandating a curriculum that many feel undermines parental choice and family values? School Districts that choose NOT to make this curriculum a “Graduation Requirement” can avoid most of the controversial aspects. Trustees can say no to making Health a stand alone class, required for graduation. Trustees can elect to embed the minimum Health Education curriculum in PE, or another class and avoid most controversial aspects of this curriculum. This topic will be discussed at CUSD's next Board meeting. Below is the documents released to the Public by Trustee Reardon. |
California Healthy Youth Act Curriculum and Instruction Capistrano Unified School District |
The following documentation was provided by Capistrano Unified School District Trustee Reardon. This documentation was provided to Trustees as information on the Districts pilot program for the implementation of California's new Healthy Youth Act Curriculum and Instruction. The highlighted areas and red comments were provided by me as taxpayer and student advocate. This is being published so that parents and the District can have open and meaningful discussion about what sex education is taught in our "local" public schools. Under California's "Local Control" it is the parents and the public that make the decision as to what should be taught. Alignment of California State Content Standards and Curriculum frameworks are simply a "recommendation", under "Local Control" they are no longer a "requirement".
In U.S., More Adults Identifying as LGBTWe should teach tolerance - but we do not mandate "Opt Out" classes to cater to a group that makes up less than 7% of the population. Under "Local Control" California no longer mandates math that aligns with minimum content standards and curriculum frameworks". But we are going to mandate that every student comply with this and parents are forced to "OPT OUT" not "OPT IN"?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I attended the December 14, 2016 CUSD Board Meeting - The documentation for the December meeting is at the end of these materials.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
December 6, 2016 CUSD BOT Meeting Agenda Item #33 INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS RECOMMENDED FOR PILOT" SECONDARY SEXUAL AND HEALTH EDUCATION, GRADE 7-8
|
||||||||
The Board Agenda is posted: http://capousd-ca.schoolloop.com/file/1218998819331/1455438848279/1373709562469729052.pdf no page listed - no supporting documentation The Board Meeting Audio is posted: http://cusd.capousd.org/cusdweb/audio2016-17/CUSDBoardMeeting.Dec.14.2016.mp3 at 148:21 VOTE
Motion to adopt the Pilot: Secondary Sexual and Health Education, Grade 7-8 with assurances that Parents would be given notice and the ability to Opt Out. Second by Trustee Hanacek.
Motion Passed 6-0-1 (Trustee Hatton-Hodson absent)
![]() BLUE CARDS
at 148:09 Kristi Draper
Three sons educated in CUSD. The Board is voting on Sex Ed Curriculum that meets California Standards and is compliant with California Law. A few years ago she spoke regarding SB 48 Fair Education Act which was signed into law January 1, 2012. Historically we have omitted facts and people from history because of their sexuality. Since SB 48 has passed nothing has been done to change curriculum to include new content required by the law. When she spoke in the past, she was told textbooks were not up for adoption for three years. She hopes to see more inclusivity in curriculum.
at 151:34 Dr Susan Holiday Presents the Item
CA Assembly Bill 329 California Healthy Youth Act took effect January 1, 2016
Professional Development will take place this Spring
TRUSTEE COMMENTS
at 1:53:00 Trustee Reardon: Has this material actually been reviewed by the IMRC Instructional Materials Review Committee?
at 153:09 Trustee McNicholas: I am on that Committee and I have not seen it.
at 1:53:14 Trustee Reardon: Was it presented to the Committee?
at at 1:53:16 Trustee McNicholas: I believe so, but I have been derelict in my duties.
* The Board Agenda states that it was submitted to the IMRC but Staff would not confirm that.
at 1:53:27 Trustee Reardon: There are two Board Delegates (Trustee Hatton-Hodson is absent)
at 153:27 Trustee Reardon- 2nd question. Can you provide clarification on the part of the act that requires parent notification and give us some assurance that Parents will have the option to Opt Out of the Pilot.
at 153:56 Dr Holiday assures Trustees that parents will be given notice and have the ability to Opt Out.
at 154:08 Trustee Hanacek: I hope parents don't Opt Out and allow their children to be informed and educated. We have bullying everyday.
at 154:53 Trustee Reardon: The Bargain that the Legislature struck to get these materials into the classroom was that parents would have the ability to Opt Out. We must honor that commitment to parents.
VOTE
at 155:16 Motion by Trustee Reardon to adopt the Pilot with assurances that Parents would be given notice and the ability to Opt Out. Second by Trustee Hanacek.
Motion Passed 6-0-1
|
WHAT ARE PARENTS IN OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS SAYING |
Silicon Valley Parents Freak Out Over Sex EdMore than 1,600 parents in Palo Alto, California, have signed a petition to stop their school district’s sex education program until it’s changed. These Silicon Valley parents say they are concerned by descriptions provided to middle school students that describe explicit sexual experiences including masturbation, premarital sex, and the use of sex toys. The parents’ petition argues the curriculum is seductive rather than educational, and “leads 7th graders to follow the examples of a wrong age group and encourages 12 years olds to try sex for ‘wonderful orgasm.’”
Cupertino Schools: New sex-ed curriculum fails to pass after parent uproarMore than 150 parents came out to a Tuesday night school board meeting to oppose a controversial new sexual health education curriculum that many said was “too graphic” and “not age appropriate” for their Cupertino Union School District seventh-graders. “The data in it was explicit; it was extremely provocative,” she said. “It was written with too much suggestion. The entire approach was all about perform, not about inform. The entire assumption made by the (curriculum) that we reviewed was that all our children are already sexually active."
Palo Alto parents protest new sex ed curriculumDistrict says program ensures consistency, complies with new lawWhile concerned parents said they support sex education, they argue that specific elements of Health Connected's middle school materials are encouraging rather than preventing risky behaviors, such as underage drinking and sex, and encroach on deeply held family values. They have also criticized the district's process for selecting the program as hasty and unrepresentative, with no parent involvement, and have asked for a more thorough vetting process akin to the one required for adoption of a full curriculum such as mathematics. "This is about the family," Erica Cai, one of several Palo Alto Unified parents who started an online petition calling for the curriculum's removal, told the Weekly in an interview. "This makes a lot of people feel like their parental right to educate their kids has been infringed upon."
‘This should not be viewed as a local issue, but one that will be coming up in every school district across the country,’ said one analyst, as immigrant parents lead the fight against a hotly debated curriculum.
Sex education for students a public right, judge rules in Clovis Unified caseDo California students have a right to learn about contraception and sexually transmitted infections? A Fresno Superior Court judge says yes. Access to medically accurate and age-appropriate sex education is an important public right, Judge Donald Black has ruled, casting questions on the state’s current law, which does not require schools to teach comprehensive sex education in school. The ruling, which hands a victory to two Clovis Unified parents, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Gay-Straight Alliance Network, also makes it crystal clear that abstinence-only education violates California law.
Parents Aren’t the Only Thing Making New Sex Ed Curriculum a Challenge for SchoolsSan Diego Unified and schools across the state are updating their sex ed curriculum in accordance with a new state law. Often, though, districts don’t get guidance on how to implement changes until long after they’re supposed to be in place. |